All markets
Japan Women's Open (Doubles): Neel/Olmos vs Haverlag/Tagger
66%chance
- Neel/Olmos65.5%
Outcomes
- Neel/Olmos66%
KES 84.50 per share
- Haverlag/Tagger35%
KES 44.50 per share
Order book
Trade Neel/OlmosMidpoint KES 84.50Spread KES 1.29
Bids
| Price | Shares | Total |
|---|---|---|
| KES 83.85 | 10 | KES 838.50 |
| KES 82.56 | 44.87 | KES 3,704.47 |
| KES 81.27 | 59.05 | KES 4,798.99 |
| KES 79.98 | 127.26 | KES 10,178.25 |
| KES 78.69 | 25 | KES 1,967.25 |
| KES 72.24 | 35.72 | KES 2,580.41 |
| KES 65.79 | 139.22 | KES 9,159.28 |
| KES 64.50 | 3,825 | KES 246,712.50 |
| KES 63.21 | 525 | KES 33,185.25 |
| KES 43.86 | 1,000 | KES 43,860.00 |
Asks
| Price | Shares | Total |
|---|---|---|
| KES 85.14 | 1,427.4 | KES 121,528.84 |
| KES 86.43 | 35.5 | KES 3,068.27 |
| KES 87.72 | 45 | KES 3,947.40 |
| KES 89.01 | 30.05 | KES 2,674.75 |
| KES 90.30 | 150 | KES 13,545.00 |
| KES 91.59 | 580 | KES 53,122.20 |
| KES 92.88 | 5 | KES 464.40 |
| KES 94.17 | 200 | KES 18,834.00 |
| KES 96.75 | 200 | KES 19,350.00 |
| KES 99.33 | 100 | KES 9,933.00 |
Rules
This market refers to the doubles tennis match between Neel/Olmos and Haverlag/Tagger in the Japan Women's Open, originally scheduled for October 21, 2026 at 9:00PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Neel/Olmos' if the team of Neel/Olmos advances against Haverlag/Tagger. This market will resolve to 'Haverlag/Tagger' if the team of Haverlag/Tagger advances against Neel/Olmos. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by November 4, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one team advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the team who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (a team withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the WTA Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.